Everything you have believed, accepted, experienced, and internalized, comprises a vast matrix that defines your energetic signature. There is truth within truths, and at the moment, you are what you think. Within the macro is the micro and each is intertwined with the other. We can take something as hard fact but keep in mind, there is so much more going on within the quantum space of life. “Fact,” comes from Latin – factium, which means “made up.” Therefore, we will question and disbelieve things that cannot be proven by hard evidence and physical findings of facts. Emotions and faith are split from hard science. The way we tend to approach how reality is defined can make us fragmented in our awareness, capabilities, and possibilities. “Imagination is more important than knowledge.” ~Albert Einstein Imagine what is yet to come, the amazing discoveries and inventions. Consider what “man” has created throughout time, all the things that were non-existent until brought into reality. There is a consciousness, beyond our understanding, yet we have an innate knowing, of which is a space of infinite miraculous possibilities. Instead, you allow things to unfold through the pull of the natural laws of the universe aligning with your energy and thinking, co-creating along the way. You contain within you the keys to infinite power and limitless possibilities if you don’t try to make things happen. The physical matter hologram is transformed thus, your life is also transformed. By exercising the freedom to think outside the box, make different choices than where you are being led by others, release limiting beliefs and concepts, and observing with the intent to define your existence, you can activate the observer effect.Ĭhoose with great conviction a state of possibility where the perfect outcome could manifest. You are the one making up the rules of your own experience of reality. Letting go of what you know, to make room for what you don’t know can be a challenge.Īs soon as you start to question or see things from a different perspective, you will run the risk of upsetting your valuable assumptions about your reality and the reality at large. It is an acquired set of rules that conform to your expectations, which have been formed and groomed since childhood. What is true today, may not be true tomorrow. So, if you learn a set of rules, beliefs and the structure supporting them, along with any adopted way of thinking from others, you have that technique’s and/or system’s blinders on. What you can think and perceive defines the limitations of what you are able to achieve. Let’s expand on this concept into everyday life. While the effects of observation are oftentimes negligible, the object still experiences a change.” Similarly, it is not possible to see any object without light hitting the object and causing it to reflect that light. A commonplace example is checking the pressure in an automobile tire this is difficult to do without letting out some of the air, thus changing the pressure. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. By illustrating how the uncertain, but lurking, threat of judicial decisions spurs increasingly rights–protective policy decisions by the executive, it poses a rejoinder to those who are skeptical that law constrains the executive.Wikipedia says, “In physics, the observer effect is the theory that simply observing a situation or phenomenon necessarily changes that phenomenon. This Article makes another contribution to the literature as well. By identifying and analyzing the observer effect, this Article provides a more accurate positive account of national security deference, without which reasoned normative judgments cannot be made. In the national security context, the executive is highly sensitive to looming judicial oversight in the national security arena, and establishes or alters policies in an effort to avert direct judicial involvement. Through psychology, we know that people act differently when they are aware that someone is watching them. Call this the “observer effect.” Physics teaches us that observing a particle alters how it behaves. While courts rarely intervene in national security disputes, the Article demonstrates that they nevertheless play a significant role in shaping executive branch security policies. Yet both sides assume that the courts’ role is minimal. Those who bemoan such deference fear for individual rights and an imbalance in the separation of powers. The executive, they contend, is constitutionally charged with such decisions and structurally better suited than the judiciary to make them. Those favoring extensive deference to executive branch national security decisions celebrate the limited role courts have played in reviewing those policies. The national security deference debate has reached a stalemate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |